Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 11:42:49 +0100 (BST) From: Mr M P Searle <csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk> To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Cc: csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk, multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: matrox millenium / XFree86 3.3 xbench results 8) Message-ID: <5418.199706111042@gudgeon.csv.warwick.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <199706110421.VAA00570@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Jun 10, 97 09:21:00 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> awk -f scripts/xstones.awk < results//matrox-1100.run
> TOTAL 1066823 lineStones
> TOTAL 434861 fillStones
> TOTAL 155673 blitStones
> TOTAL 57203637 arcStones
> TOTAL 3278002 textStones
> TOTAL 598692 complexStones
> TOTAL 496071 xStones
>
> resolution 1152x864 32bit color depth
>
>
>
> Amancio
>
> >From The Desk Of Mr M P Searle :
> > > {hasty} awk -f scripts/xstones.awk < results/matrox.run
> > > TOTAL 1947365 lineStones
> > > TOTAL 964984 fillStones
> > > TOTAL 452761 blitStones
> > > TOTAL 61404537 arcStones
> > > TOTAL 3285909 textStones
> > > TOTAL 993398 complexStones
> > > TOTAL 1139709 xStones
> > > ^^^^^^^
> > > I am in love !
> > >
> > > resolution 1280x1024 color depth: 8
> > >
> > > Not too long ago X servers based on et4000 used to clock in around 10 to
> > > 15k xstones. In such a short time to get this kind of performance
> > > is almost a miracle .
> > >
> >
> > But why run it in 8bpp? (Have you got any figures for 16 or 24bpp?)
> >
> > BTW, I'm fairly sure this is more than Xi claim for the Millenium, the
> > fastest card under AccelX. IIRC AccelX/Millenium does 1.0-1.1 MxStones.
> > They also have no numbers for higher bpps...
> >
> > Thanks, Michael.
> >
>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5418.199706111042>