Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 19:23:36 +0100 From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, wosch@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/top/files m_freebsd21.c m_freebsd21.man defaults ports/sysutils/top Makefile Message-ID: <199602131823.TAA01299@localhost> In-Reply-To: <199602131035.CAA02430@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> References: <199602121722.SAA00550@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199602131035.CAA02430@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami writes:
> * > freebsd20 -> freebsd21 module
> *
> * Should have been freebsd22. Sigh. I've raised my objection before.
>
>Yeah I thought "why is it 21"? What's the issue here? Why is Wolfram
>committing a file for 2.1 in the 2.2-current ports tree (although it
>appears to work for 2.2-current as well)?
After shipping FreeBSD 2.0.5 CDROM, I received a half dozen mails
from users, who read the man page (sic!!!) of the adduser(8)
command:
[...]
HISTORY
The adduser command appeared in FreeBSD 2.1
Wolfram
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602131823.TAA01299>