Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 08:22:45 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org (Justin T. Gibbs) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PHK malloc against Mark Moraes malloc Message-ID: <199510100722.IAA05871@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <199510092346.QAA02723@aslan.cdrom.com> from "Justin T. Gibbs" at Oct 9, 95 04:46:46 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that Justin T. Gibbs said: > Were these test performed without EXTRA_SANITY defined in phkmalloc? No, EXTRA_SANITY is defined for now. It explains the time I've got. Even with that slowdown, we can see that in terms of space, phkmalloc/2 is better than gnumalloc. Even faster on most tests. Congrats Poul-Henning ! -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #2: Sat Oct 7 23:37:44 MET 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510100722.IAA05871>