Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:25:07 +0300 From: Taras Savchuk <taras.savchuk@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: May be a bug in fsck [ after super block crash on 5.4-STABLE ] Message-ID: <84099c3d0511030325q6d1df92ag77310ff1b03a2d15@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
My SATA HDD with UFS2 crashed. While checking HDD fsck said, that alternate super block at block 32 is not present. In 'man fsck' I saw, that in UFS2 (my file system) alternate super block is usually located in block 160 (For UFS1 - in 32). So the question is: why fsck trying to find alternate superblock in wrong block for UFS2? I can suppose, that fsck dont know file system type (UFS1 or UFS2) while checking, but such assumption seems to be wrong.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?84099c3d0511030325q6d1df92ag77310ff1b03a2d15>