Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 12:59:13 -0700 From: Ryan Mansager <rmger@nrez.net> To: "Brett D. Estrade" <estrabd@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting Message-ID: <20020712195913.GA25370@beau.nrez.net> In-Reply-To: <20020712141523.92011.qmail@web20704.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20020712141523.92011.qmail@web20704.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My only mention of an OS was inferred through reference of hip linux
talk. My letter was about project size, not OS preference.
Pre-setup tools and community could be beneficial to us. Or they could
not be. Moving to SF would be a nice step from where the project is at
now, and/or will be a community it may be beneficial to be a part of
later.
Sorry if my previous post seemed tainted.
-ryan
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Brett D. Estrade wrote:
> Obviously, I'll go along with what ever the powers that be decide,and
> I am no SF evangelist by any stretch, but I think you are falling into
> the same elitist-type attitude towards your (and my) OS of choice and
> any projects having to do with it. Yes, SF has a lot of linux-heads
> since that is who it is directed towards, but with 10's of 1000's of
> project currently list, many of which are not even actively worked
> upon, I doubt our project will attract the attention of those not
> interested in clustering FreeBSD machines (overwhelming majority, I
> would say) until a superior and legendary clustering technology
> emerges from the project.
>
> On the otherhand, a negative I see towards SF is that the project
> leaders, although having a good amount of control, do not have ultimate
> control of the servers themselves. In my eyes, this would be a reason
> not to use SF. The benefit, though, is that its got most things you
> would need (and yes, fluff you don't). Whatever is decided, I think
> all would agree that effort and focus should be placed on the project's
> goals and objectives, not the headaches associated with setting up
> your own cvs, lists, etc.
>
> If need be though, I can provide a mirror site or cvs, too.
>
> BTW, what is the time line as far as setting atleast something up?
>
> Just my $0.02
>
> Brett
>
> > Sourceforge definitely has it's advantages of many minds on the
> same
> > track (clustering.foundries.sourceforge.net), with tons of poop
> and
> > fluff and hip linux talk being it's downside.
> >
> > If the idea of starting small and growing appeals to the team (to
> > Andy), I suggest perhaps no sourceforge for now.
> >
> > If the idea of popularity, gossip, and a million people'ss
> opinions
> > seem beneficial and appeals to the team (to Andy), sourceforge
> seems
> > key.
> >
> > We can always start on SF and move off, or move TO it down the
> road
>
>
> =====
> public BrettDEstrade(){
> this.email="estrabd(at)yahoo(dot)com";
> this.url1="http://www.brettsbsd.net/";
> this.eFax="(253)484-8755";
> this.iM ="YMsg(estrabd),ICQ(46248888),AIM(bz743)";
> this.misc ="A.M.D.G.";
> }
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message
--
Ryan Mansager
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020712195913.GA25370>
