Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:30:06 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: llwang@infor.org Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 32-bit binaries (e.g. wine) and 64-bit kernel structures Message-ID: <4ea6657e.2VBpjdwl/pfQOFcl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <CAAMzD73=mQPv-FUa7ZBsFWntmK=RkVNide8pGUq8EzCa7Ln1qQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAAMzD71D%2B%2Bq_XjuCe=is2SAsW843_TNYmxaFOcjM4-%2BQ-jRrzg@mail.gmail.com> <4ea55387.DnwwF%2BhvqjtumYN4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <CAAMzD73=mQPv-FUa7ZBsFWntmK=RkVNide8pGUq8EzCa7Ln1qQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" <llwang@infor.org> wrote: > a lot of things (e.g. certain devices in the devfs) > are not available in the jail. I have gotten the impression that there's a way to fix that -- it involves something along the lines of a nullfs mount IIRC -- but I'm by no means an expert on jails. > ... I do believe the 64-bit kernel returns 64-bit > structures even in 32-bit jails. That is arguably a bug in the jail support :(
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ea6657e.2VBpjdwl/pfQOFcl%perryh>