Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:49:06 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Sylvestre Gallon <syl@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 166722 for review Message-ID: <200907291049.07162.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <200907290841.n6T8fjqI025079@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200907290841.n6T8fjqI025079@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 10:41:45 Sylvestre Gallon wrote: > + With this code gcc dump exactly the same switch function > that do nothing. + But for the multipleswitch the functionn > switcha and switchb are also generated. If you put a "static" into the function declaration, will gcc remove those functions? Also, what happens when switch statements have more spread values than 1,2,3,4 ? E.g. 1,2,3,100,101,102,500,501,502 ... --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200907291049.07162.hselasky>