Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 07:41:54 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> Cc: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Deadlock with vinum raid5 Message-ID: <20000403074154.Q59549@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <200004022022.WAA84522@freebsd.dk> References: <20000402221829.A25555@cicely8.cicely.de> <200004022022.WAA84522@freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, 2 April 2000 at 22:22:39 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Bernd Walter wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 09:39:36PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: >>> I dont think vinum is/was usable under -current at least not the >>> RAID5 stuff, its broken, and some of it is because greg is not >>> up to date with what -current looks like these days. >> >> Can you please explain what have massivly changed in current that relates >> to vinum? > > The changes done by phk to seperate out the io stuff from struct > buf. Alfred and Bernd came up with fixes that seem to work. I still need to review them, but I'm in the process of installing an up-to-date -CURRENT on my test box. Watch this space. Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000403074154.Q59549>