Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 01:21:00 +0200 From: Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> To: Mario Marietto <marietto2008@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com>, "questions@freebsd.org" <questions@freebsd.org>, infoomatic <infoomatic@gmx.at> Subject: Re: Docker Message-ID: <CAFYkXjnkv-UKBcVe3Wz=y9RLkMJrpE0%2Be3Pw_Vfq7v4CKKEg_g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B1FSijAYbWDktOEbcAuAF8P-fTK5k_bDd0_isEKTUEAD-%2B2Ug@mail.gmail.com> References: <20230329053443.6ADA6B6AFED5@dhcp-8e64.meeting.ietf.org> <34b4b76e-1c41-4cfb-9e86-856f01e8abc9@app.fastmail.com> <CA%2B1FSihVrJ8cZ4ZU6mMr0sKJsZ98V4fh2vpDLugw7MGj-%2BEBPg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B1FSijL50mQ-HveBA4HZeNkSoaORv=aty-15nNLzn9amzY_nw@mail.gmail.com> <6002f636-310b-a9fd-b82f-346618976983@timpreston.net> <CA%2B1FSigV_pPwVW%2BDd8WZYGcNQVt7%2BYOcsnJFoRhS6jL5A636pg@mail.gmail.com> <20230412150350.12f97eb2c9dd566b8c8702d2@sohara.org> <CA%2B1FSihVPCQ6tp8u=aqnLyyOPpCMrnhYGcC8bCUgRbFHTdY5sA@mail.gmail.com> <1535315680.2770963.1681309684072@mail.yahoo.com> <CAHieY7RFe0P85twcs1NiiAvTTr4oGPJEtXEkufsXswQt3ECGvg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B1FSiiCG-iugAbSoNC2r5WXCJvgi6pj3jG74jCwukhNtb_XGA@mail.gmail.com> <CADGo8CXsCYCOi%2Bwk2ED7zpJdFQDhynzD0u1qFDUFS3RveS8wOg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B1FSij3VXqsGs5ZTUv%2B9Q2wJ18yCqVqgHAyGfCWc0C%2Bxi=KXw@mail.gmail.com> <543289768.3317542.1681394425362@mail.yahoo.com> <CA%2B1FSiicxR1hbd=LO8%2BPMyv7=OmXZGa3Uco1p-rRP3pe1Yf6hA@mail.gmail.com> <f59385ad-a467-5e24-3c17-72c17d3b5aca@gmx.at> <887947753.4080046.1681511775374@mail.yahoo.com> <CA%2B1FSijAYbWDktOEbcAuAF8P-fTK5k_bDd0_isEKTUEAD-%2B2Ug@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 12:46=E2=80=AFAM Mario Marietto wrote: > So,let me understand : docker images aren't compatible with FreeBSD. Imag= ine that the FreeBSD jails will be not compatible with Linux. Wow,this is t= rue interoperability. Mario, (Free)BSD is Unix derivative and thus standard compliant, look at sockets, IPv4, IPv6, Jails, ZFS, etc. It was Linux folks who invent things that are only compatible with Linux and only until new fancy pancy Linux only revelation is introduced then those solutions are not even Linux compatible anymore. "Progress by Enforced Changes"^TM. It was Docker that did not take other OS into consideration at design stage. It was SystemD that did not take other OS into consideration at design stage, and now lots of application follow that systemd core dependency making them hardly portable to any other OS. What about kernel API changes with every minor release that started around 2.4.11 (I was using Linux 2.0.36 / ~1998 .. 2.4.12 / ~2007)? Look at DRM mess it introduced to graphics driver world. How would you call that interoperability / portability / long term maintenance? Linux by design is self-incompatible. Do you really want us to to follow that "fashions" with a life span shorter than a yogurt? There are reasons for people avoiding Linux. --=20 CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXjnkv-UKBcVe3Wz=y9RLkMJrpE0%2Be3Pw_Vfq7v4CKKEg_g>