Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Oct 1997 21:57:43 +1000 (EST)
From:      Andrew Reilly <reilly@zeta.org.au>
To:        jlemon@americantv.com
Cc:        beattie@stt3.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: doscmd 970320
Message-ID:  <199710031157.VAA02076@gurney.reilly.home>
In-Reply-To: <19971002215623.26008@right.PCS>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On a slightly different tack: I run a 2.2.* system, and had been
wondering about upgrading to -current for doscmd, to get the
DOS/Windows version of the Motorola dsp56303 assembler going.  I tried
it under the experimental, 2.2 version and it didn't work because it
is a dos4gw, 32-bit thing.  (Probably had no hope: I've since discovered
that it doesn't work under Windows 3.11 or '95 either.)

Now I don't know whether the 3.0 doscmd could handle it better or at
all, but today I tried the -NT version under Wine, and I appear to have
been completely successful.

There are obviously cases where DOS is the only option, but this is the
second thing that I expected to need a dos emulator for, and didn't. 
(The other was the PIC microcontroller assembler: it also has a
straight Windows version that worked OK in Wine.)

On  2 Oct, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> Yes, there is a better one in -current.  Unfortunately, it doesn't work
> with 2.2.X.

All praise to the emulator gurus, and a big THANKS is all I can say.

-- 
Andrew

"The steady state of disks is full."
				-- Ken Thompson






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710031157.VAA02076>