Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 19:29:26 -0400 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not to beat a dead horse, but ... Message-ID: <53964356.90201@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <20140609190409.GU31367@funkthat.com> References: <5394A848.7030609@m5p.com> <20140609190409.GU31367@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/09/14 15:04, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > [...] > If you were running dnetc, your complaint is that one processor > hog wasn't able to hog the processor as much as another processor > hog? If the numbers above are to be believed, _ULE is doing a > better job than _4BSD since it more evenly shared the processor > w/ the other processor hog, in that they both got ~50% of the > cpu... If this is the case, then you need to use nice w/ buildworld > to give it higher priority... > [...] dnetc runs at nice 20 and is essentially 100% compute bound. I'm more than happy for buildworld/buildkernel to get every cycle it can when it emerges from an I/O wait. -- George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53964356.90201>