Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 17:39:43 -0500 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_synch.c Message-ID: <20010704173943.C296@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010704134410.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 01:44:10PM -0700 References: <20010704105848.K1438@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <XFMail.010704134410.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 13:44:10 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 04-Jul-01 Greg Lehey wrote: >> On Tuesday, 3 July 2001 at 0:53:35 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >>> jhb 2001/07/03 00:53:35 PDT >>> >>> Modified files: >>> sys/kern kern_synch.c >>> Log: >>> Axe spl's that are covered by the sched_lock (and have been for quite >>> some time.) >> >> I still get very confused when people talk about spls in -CURRENT. > > They are still there even if they are stub functions. I'm just axeing some of > the stubs that have been fully replaced. OK, I can see the point if this is code which can be MFCd. But by the looks of it this isn't the case here. So what good does it do? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010704173943.C296>