Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Dec 1998 23:27:42 +0100
From:      Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Proposed addition to fetch(1)
Message-ID:  <19981203232742.A5266@klemm.gtn.com>
In-Reply-To: <199812032055.MAA00648@apollo.backplane.com>; from Matthew Dillon on Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 12:55:26PM -0800
References:  <19981203200743.A861@cons.org> <19981203210935.A16110@klemm.gtn.com> <199812032055.MAA00648@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 12:55:26PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> 
>     What would FETCH_MAX do?    Generally speaking, when you type
>     'make' in a port you want to make the port no matter how big
>     it is.

And when I do

	setenv BATCH true
	cd /usr/ports/<category>
	make all install clean

Just a thought, or ?

-- 
Andreas Klemm                                http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
     What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ?
          http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html
             "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs)      ``powered by FreeBSD SMP''

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981203232742.A5266>