Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:19:30 -0700 From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Subject: Re: [OT] What's "QED"? (was Re: Wisdom of automating upgrades) Message-ID: <200406081019.30500.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <40C5BCAC.6090401@circlesquared.com> <40C5E758.5050406@circlesquared.com> <20040608123647.2cab2e91.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 08 June 2004 09:36 am, Bill Moran wrote: > Peter Risdon <peter@circlesquared.com> wrote: > > Robert Huff wrote: > > >Peter Risdon writes: > > >> I suppose what I'm driving at is whether the RELENG_4 branch > > >> sees many commits that are likely to be problematic. > > > > > > In general, no. > > > On the other hand ... think of this as a Murphy's Law scenario: > > >if you automate, it _will_ break horribly two days before some > > >absolutely critical deadline. > > > > QED > > I must be "out of touch" with my jargon ... > > What's "QED"? I remember seeing that at the end of mathematical proofs at the University where the professor was too lazy to finish their documentation. It was much more fitting here :). Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406081019.30500.kstewart>