Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 09:19:58 +0930 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_log.c subr_rlist.c tty_pty.c tty_snoop.c tty_tty.c uipc_domain.c vfs_subr.c src/sys/net bpf.c netisr.h route.c src/sys/netinet igmp.c in_proto.c ip_fw.h tcp_subr.c src/sys/sys buf.h exe Message-ID: <199709162350.JAA00511@word.smith.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Sep 1997 10:46:42 MST." <341EC602.167EB0E7@whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Bruce Evans wrote: > I think this has been discussed before.. > but... > WHY!!!!! I think Bruce's line was "be consistent with whatever file you're in". > in the example given I think the original made more sense, > and didn't we vote to stop adding more of the stupid __P() stuff? IMHO, we should ANSIfy wherever we go. Others have different opinions. The "be consistent" line was the consensus that came out of the last war on this topic. mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709162350.JAA00511>