Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:36:10 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: M_NOTIFICATION in <sys/mbuf.h>? Message-ID: <608458837.1060796170@melange.errno.com> In-Reply-To: <20030913233905.GA3834@crodrigues.org> References: <20030913233905.GA3834@crodrigues.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> While trying to port the SCTP-KAME code to CURRENT, > I noticed that M_NOTIFICATION is missing from <sys/mbuf.h> > in CURRENT, but it is present in the KAME version of this > file. > > Any reason not to apply this patch? > > > --- sys/sys/mbuf.h.orig Sat Sep 13 19:34:07 2003 > +++ sys/sys/mbuf.h Sat Sep 13 19:34:14 2003 > @@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ > #define M_FIRSTFRAG 0x1000 /* packet is first fragment */ > #define M_LASTFRAG 0x2000 /* packet is last fragment */ > > +#define M_NOTIFICATION 0x8000 /* notification event */ > + > /* > * External buffer types: identify ext_buf type. > */ I don't know what M_NOTIFICATION is used for but if it's applied sparingly it might be better to use an m_tag instead. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?608458837.1060796170>