Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:44 +0300 From: Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <jorgeassembler1@outlook.com> To: "freebsd-chat@freebsd.org" <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? Message-ID: <COL127-W276A61C2965CC60C598EE6E87F0@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <44pplhc3mw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <COL127-W4961547B486570D01FA0EBE87F0@phx.gbl>, <COL127-W5DF5F825DDBDDA7556623E87F0@phx.gbl>, <44pplhc3mw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: freebsd-chat-local@be-well.ilk.org > To: jorgeassembler1@outlook.com > Subject: Re: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? > Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:52:39 -0400 > CC: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org > > Jorge Luis Carvalho Santos <jorgeassembler1@outlook.com> writes: > > >> From: jorgeassembler1@outlook.com > >> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org > >> Subject: To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? > >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:27:03 +0300 > >> > >> Is written in OpenBSD FAQ:"One important difference between OpenBSD > >> and many other operating systems is the documentation. OpenBSD > >> developers take great pride in the system man pages. The man pages > >> are the authoritative source of OpenBSD documentation -- not this > >> FAQ, not third-party independently maintained pages, not "HOWTO"s, > >> etc. " > >> To that create a FAQ that says no be unreliable? > > > > because no one responds? > > I see no reason to disagree with OpenBSD's FAQ answer. > I would give the same answer for FreeBSD, > although maybe not quite as strongly. > _______________________________________________ You understand Portuguese of Brazil ?If no, the that made to understand?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?COL127-W276A61C2965CC60C598EE6E87F0>