Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 12:27:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I2O only available under NDA? Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970711122645.6378B-100000@terra> In-Reply-To: <199707111508.AAA24459@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 12 Jul 1997, Michael Smith wrote: > To be honest, I think that what can be seen of their architecture > _sucks_. It offers little or no parallelism, and for all that the > '960 is reasonably quick and VxWorks a fairly nice RTOS, it simply I think you can make a pretty strong case that I2O is there to cover for the performance failings of Windows/NT. ron
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.970711122645.6378B-100000>