Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Jun 1997 16:29:39 +0000 ()
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
To:        roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert)
Cc:        hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: poor memory bandwidth on ABIT IT5H rev 1.5
Message-ID:  <199706111629.JAA00216@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
In-Reply-To: <19970611093951.33576@keltia.freenix.fr> from Ollivier Robert at "Jun 11, 97 09:39:51 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

...
> > The major limitation of the VX chip set is that it only supports
> > 64MB of DRAM covered by secondary cache, so it is no good for 
> > server machines with a few hundred MB of RAM ...
> 
> Yes, I don't understand why they keep this stupid limit (except for
> marketing reasons that is).

It is a technical limitation, you can cache 64MB of memory using a 
single 8 bit tag ram, if you want to cache more than that you need
a wider tag ram, and more bits between the cache controller chip
and the tags, and a wider tag comparitor.  

Those the cost to do this is small when you consider that 95% of the
target market for the chipset is not going to use these added features
it becomes a simple economic decision.

Is what I don't like is that Intel tends to make it hard to find out
the detailed limitations of each chipset the produce.  They have
gotten better over time, but they don't come out right up front and
say things about some of the more important details (like the fact
that the TX chip set has no Parity logic :-().

-- 
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation, Inc.                   Reliable computers for FreeBSD



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706111629.JAA00216>