Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:12:12 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain Message-ID: <20120428031212.GE80419@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <5BCE2E77-2B45-43B7-AB1F-6E6C13B87B34@gid.co.uk> References: <20120426093548.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <5BCE2E77-2B45-43B7-AB1F-6E6C13B87B34@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote: > > Apparently, current dependencies are much more spread, e.g. /bin/sh > > is dynamically linked [etc] > > That seems like a bad mistake, because it would prevent even booting > single-user if rtld/libraries are broken. When one enters single user they are prompted for which shell to use. If /bin/sh is broken due to being dynamic, '/rescue/sh' will likely still work. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120428031212.GE80419>