Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:15:23 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org> To: "Mars G. Miro" <marsgmiro@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp Cc: daichi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) Message-ID: <4418D84B.6090005@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <28edec3c0603151829r7ff125f8m3dfb8c194d0731b7@mail.gmail.com> References: <28edec3c0603151829r7ff125f8m3dfb8c194d0731b7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mars G. Miro wrote: > Daichi-san, > >> I have updated the patchset-9 of unionfs. >> > > We've been using an in-house LiveCD toolkit that uses unionfs (where > cd9660 is the lower layer) and all I can say is that these patches are > very important, at least on => 6.X, otherwise things would just not > work. I believe the FreeSBIE folks also went thru the same experience > as they also do this (cd9960 lower, unionfs upper). > > I have tried your p8-patchset diffs for about 2 weeks now and It Works > (TM). Will try your p9 diffs soon ;-) Good. > Will these diffs remain to be diffs or do people think that these will > be integrated into the sources sometime? It is depending on src committer's intentions. I am a ports committer. I want to merge it into -current and I think it is getting ripe for integrating into -current. The patchset-9 already has enough quality for merge. All folks have interests in improved unionfs should keep attentions and ask "how about merge?" at every turn :) -- Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4418D84B.6090005>