Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 15:06:15 +0100 (MET) From: Søren Schmidt <sos@ravenock.cybercity.dk> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which lists for discussion. Message-ID: <199703171406.PAA04521@ravenock.cybercity.dk> In-Reply-To: <l03010d00af52e59348d3@[208.2.87.4]> from Richard Wackerbarth at "Mar 17, 97 06:28:24 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In reply to Richard Wackerbarth who wrote: > joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) replies: > > >As mika ruohotie wrote: > > > >> while i post, to me it sounds a nice idea to twiddle the naming like it > >> was suggested... > >> > >> 2.1.x stable > >> 2.2.x current > >> 3.0.x future (experimental?) > > > >Well, we've been referring to the experimental stuff as -current for > >all the time. I'm afraid it's simply too late switching paradigms > >now, since it would confuse the hell out of the users. > > I can also argue that all 2.2 discussion has always been on "current" > and never on "stable". Rather than move the 2.2 discussion, we could > equally move the 3.0 discussion. Well, actually it is quite easy: 2.1.X dead 2.2.X stable 3.x.x current Thats it, like it or not :) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end ..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703171406.PAA04521>