Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 23:25:59 +0100 From: phk@phk.freebsd.dk To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Indiscriminately installing all .h files in /usr/include/* Message-ID: <43624.1044915959@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:15:01 PST." <20030210221501.GF88781@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030210221501.GF88781@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >* Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> [030210 14:09] wrote: >> > >> > If there was a way to do it via cpp defines inside the header that would >> > be nice. >> >> Something like this perhaps? >> ^/* EXPORT_HEADER */$ > >Yes, something like that. I know of one company that brackets the >headers with $COMPANY_PRIVATE for stuff that shouldn't be visible in >/usr/include. if you wind up with an empty file it isn't even installed. I would prefer labeling the stuff that should go into /usr/include, it shouldn't be the default to export stuff unless you ask for it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43624.1044915959>