Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:35:18 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New preview patch for ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion Message-ID: <20040622133000.T6489@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20040622020620.A16578@xorpc.icir.org> References: <40D754D5.1070805@freebsd.org> <20040622115532.W5744@mp2.macomnet.net> <20040622020620.A16578@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 02:06-0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:15:21PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > ... > > > Consider this a FYI. It is very much a WIP at the moment. I want > > > to get this into the tree in before 5.3 code freeze. > > > > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to > > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape. Is it really worth to commit that > > mostly cleanup code before say 6-CURRENT with a chance to > > of course it is! i also do not follow the reasoning -- given that it is > cleaning up code, it is only welcome at any stage except perhaps > in code freeze. My concern is bugs. Especially in cleanup code, especially in ip_pcbopt and ip_reass. > plus, is the 'bad shape' related at all to what andre posted ? 'bad shape' is related to 5-CURRENT we are trying to make -STABLE. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622133000.T6489>