Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:49:53 +0000 From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD Message-ID: <AANLkTinglrzHitBGdw6TgRJsvl3ZfEOLLIbJk4JPaegc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinY2-YH2UU5ZY1QFxfm6ogdQU_A7vW-D2x_l2cB@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTilBgX9gACP0luWAk2hQDCmp_pyAW_Dye85-6TOg@mail.gmail.com> <4C08BEDC.7010807@icyb.net.ua> <AANLkTinY2-YH2UU5ZY1QFxfm6ogdQU_A7vW-D2x_l2cB@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/4/10, b. f. <bf1783@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 6/4/10, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> wrote: >> on 04/06/2010 11:13 b. f. said the following: >>> Mark Linimon wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:18:41PM +0200, Alban Hertroys wrote: > > NetBSD allows one to set HAVE_BINUTILS=2.19 and use > > http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/external/gpl3/?only_with_tag=MAIN > > See the README there for their policy statement. I think they decided > to bite the bullet and allow optional use of the later version because > it was becoming increasingly hard to support some of their many > architectures with the old stuff. But no doubt their mailing lists > have more information. I should say that, with reference to the NetBSD changes I mentioned earlier, and John Baldwin's comments about having a GPLv3 toolchain option in our own tree, that despite NetBSD's cautious policy statement regarding GPLv3-licensed software in their base system, and their requirement that such software should be optional, it appears that use of such software is now their _default_ since Nov. 2009: http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/mk/bsd.own.mk.diff?r1=1.593&r2=1.594&only_with_tag=MAIN&f=h b.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinglrzHitBGdw6TgRJsvl3ZfEOLLIbJk4JPaegc>