Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 14:31:04 -0800 From: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce A. Mah) To: hawkeyd@visi.com Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, stable at FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: My first world build and install Message-ID: <200203082231.g28MV4T11958@bmah.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20020308162012.B3127@sheol.localdomain> References: <20020307205848.A1191@sheol.localdomain> <20020308155441.GC271@stefan.fafoe> <20020308104457.A2368@sheol.localdomain> <20020308175938.GD271@stefan.fafoe> <200203081850.g28IoEX05982@bmah.dyndns.org> <20020308131413.A2880@sheol.localdomain> <200203081937.g28JbCH06877@bmah.dyndns.org> <20020308162012.B3127@sheol.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > > > I would have thought such a configuration would be commonplace, at least > > > amongst the release engineers and RC testers? > > > > There isn't any such configuration because it depends so much on what > > you initially installed from your last RELEASE. > > Ah. Yep, I s'pose that's true. Wouldn't it be cool if the next sysinstall > wrote out a make.conf snippet to somewhere on completion? > > <mutter>Just what we need, another "I volunteer someone else".</mutter> Patches welcome. :-) This doesn't sound real easy to me, but I've only peeked at little bits of sysinstall. > > So my make.conf (which is older than dirt, incidentally) doesn't look > > much like yours: > > > > USA_RESIDENT=YES > > KERNCONF=NIMITZ NAT GENERIC > > ^^^^^^^^^ Meaning, these three kernel configs get automagically built? > Which of the three gets installed as "/kernel"? The first one. Cheers, Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203082231.g28MV4T11958>