Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:59:12 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 260207] www/rubygem-gollum update to latest 5.2.3 Message-ID: <bug-260207-21402-OTqkvhZuRD@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-260207-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-260207-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260207 Thibault Jouan <tj+freebsd_ports@a13.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tj+freebsd_ports@a13.fr --- Comment #19 from Thibault Jouan <tj+freebsd_ports@a13.fr> --- Hi,=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 I'm updating a patch to update RubyGems (devel/ruby-gems,=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 bug #258108). Most of the work is about updating our own gem=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20 specification patches (Recent RubyGems changed the output format for=20=20= =20 gem specifications). `www/rubygem-gollum-lib' is one of those gem=20=20=20= =20=20=20 ports which have a gem specification patch, so I have to keep it=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20 updated.=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 But I now notice there are now two different patches: www/rubygem-gollum-lib/files/patch-gemspec.rb www/rubygem-gollum-lib/files/patch-gollum-lib.gemspec I noticed some ports use the generic `patch-gemspec.rb' filename, others are based on the original filename (if there is a reason/convention, I'm happy to learn it). Here I guess maybe only one is used, or is it necessary to have both? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-260207-21402-OTqkvhZuRD>