Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:13:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/i386/i386 genassym.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101613360.90002-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20030410162943.T37530-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There is NO support for locking a KSE to a CPU yet. That is a completely > > > > different question. > > > > > > > > > There is in ULE. > > > > But you keep your own information on this.. > > Yes, I'm telling you, if you add anything make it specific to the > scheduler. It doesn't not need to be in scheduler independant code. We > just need a new system call for binding a kse to a cpu. This will be > scheduler independant and then we can call a scheduler dependant routine > like sched_bind(kse, cpu); exactly my thought. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > information in the scheduler specific data. I already have an entry for > > > > > > it in ULE. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101613360.90002-100000>