Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:05:55 +0200 (CEST) From: "A. L. Meyers" <a.l.meyers@consult-meyers.com> To: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Message-ID: <20010723140335.S99402-100000@localhost.consult-meyers.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107231815400.71442-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Max Khon wrote: > hi, there! > > On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, A. L. Meyers wrote: > > > Well, Steve, at least someone understood my posting as I meant > > it. Thanks! > > > > A comparison: > > Debian GNU/Linux has 3 trees: 1. stable 2. testing 3. unstable > > > > "stable" there means exactly what it says. Although breaks are > > not non-existent, they are extremely rare (never experienced one > > personally, changes were security fixes). > > that's what for RELENG_4_3 branch was created > (4.3-RELEASE + security fixes). When FreeBSD 4.4 will be out RELENG_4_4 > branch will also be created for security fixes > > /fjoe > > Max, do you suggest that if someone wants "stable-stable" not just "stable" he should cvsup RELENG_4_3 instead of RELENG_4? Lucien To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010723140335.S99402-100000>