Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 05:40:05 -0700 From: "David G. Andersen" <danderse@cs.utah.edu> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: File table exhaustion patch Message-ID: <20021122054005.A13937@cs.utah.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021122080515.GQ36738@starjuice.net>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:05:15AM %2B0200 References: <20021121105204.B75421@cs.utah.edu> <20021121152539.U44884-100000@patrocles.silby.com> <20021122080515.GQ36738@starjuice.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Sheldon Hearn just mooed:
> On (2002/11/21 15:29), Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> > HOWEVER, we're in a code freeze leading up to 5.0-release, and local DoSes
> > aren't a critical bug.
>
> Is that the official FreeBSD SO team viewpoint on local DoS
> vulnerabilities?
Well, keep in mind that this isn't really a bad one - it doesn't
crash the machine, and it's moderately easy to identify the (l)user who's
doing it. I've actually not seen this happen maliciously, I've only
seen it happen by accident with buggy research code, some of it mine.
It's annoying when it happens, but there are a million things a local
user can do to be annoying.
-Dave
--
work: dga@lcs.mit.edu me: dga@pobox.com
MIT Laboratory for Computer Science http://www.angio.net/
I do not accept unsolicited commercial email. Do not spam me.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021122054005.A13937>