Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 19:42:28 -0600 (CST) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding process ID listing to netstat Message-ID: <199801100142.TAA23025@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <28067.884362225@verdi.nethelp.no> (sthaug@nethelp.no) References: <199801090654.AAA15353@detlev.UUCP> <28067.884362225@verdi.nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Would it be useful to others to allow netstat to give the process ID's >> that are using sockets? > Yes - but aren't you reimplementing lsof? Would it be a good idea to add > lsof to the base system instead, like top was added? I'm not familiar with 'lsof'. I'll have to check it out. I just hacked it last night when I didn't know what a couple of ports were being used for, gdb'd my way into finding the stucture, and decided I didn't ever want to do that again. Cheers, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801100142.TAA23025>