Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 10:50:04 -0800 From: Deepwell Internet <freebsd@deepwell.com> To: Dan Mahoney <dan@wolf.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Aliased IPs Message-ID: <4.1.19981216104635.00b4b780@mail1.dcomm.net> In-Reply-To: <19981216104707.C18920@wolf.com> References: <4.1.19981216100101.00c66af0@mail1.dcomm.net> <4.1.19981216100101.00c66af0@mail1.dcomm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes. The ability to track bandwidth to an IP is very nice. Right now, aside from running the normal webstats I also have IPFW in place with a separate count rule for each IP. I parse these numbers every 30 minutes and can get numbers as to how much traffic each IP does. This works great. We can use these numbers to see if someone is using so much traffic that we need to move them to a webserver with a smaller customer load. At 10:47 AM 12/16/98 -0800, you wrote: >> Are there people running full production webserver off of one IP address? >> Have you had any problems? > >I'm running a couple dozen web domains off a single domain, >but plan to move to IP-based virtual domains pretty soon. >I have absolutely no problems using name-based virtuals; >it works wonderfully and I've never received even a single >complaint from people with HTTP 0.9 browsers. > >The reason I'm moving to IP-based virtuals is that I want to >be able to track/limit bandwidth usage per domain. My >preferred solution for this is dummynet, and doing so >with dummynet required distinct IP addresses. > >Dan Mahoney >dan@wolf.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19981216104635.00b4b780>