Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:29:46 +0200 From: Marcin Jessa <lists@yazzy.org> To: jeffm@frob.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, NetBSD-current <current-users@NetBSD.org>, FreeBSD-Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Looking for networking solution. Message-ID: <20050623122946.72bb97a5.lists@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <27188.130.76.32.15.1118844489.squirrel@www.frob.org> References: <58397.148.122.180.9.1118829978.squirrel@mail.yazzy.org> <79722fad05061505141b3ddb4c@mail.gmail.com> <27188.130.76.32.15.1118844489.squirrel@www.frob.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi guys. Thanks for the help and good advices. I just received source code from guys at MITRE in McLean, VA for FreeBSD and will do some testing on it. "The code is an open implementation of ISO International Standards and it's yours for the asking; there is no licensing." I was thinking, maybe someone would be interested in implementing it into FreeBSD's and/or NetBSD's source tree since the code is avaliable for both the BSD's? On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:08:09 -0400 (EDT) jeffm@frob.org wrote: > > On 6/15/05, M.Jessa <lists@yazzy.org> wrote: > > Hi guys. > > > > I am looking for solution I could implement on a link with a huge > > latency > <snip> > > I am only familiar with split connection gateways. They totally isolate > TCP from the effects of the satellite link by using some sort of > enhanced protocol over the middle hop. The end TCPs are terminated > locally and do not see large RTTs or latency. I did some work last > year with Mitre's reference implementation of SCPS-TP, which made a > huge difference. However, splitting the TCP connection does cause > some issues.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050623122946.72bb97a5.lists>