Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:08:59 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com>
Cc:        Qing Li <qingli@freebsd.org>, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@freebsd.org>, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: recent change to ifconfig breaks OpenVPN?
Message-ID:  <4A71D3AB.2070504@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4304DB85EF@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
References:  <B4AA014B-2444-40AA-A3A3-417E4B89DF90@lassitu.de><4A709126.5050102@elischer.org><3A1518B9-2C8C-4F05-9195-82C6017E4902@lassitu.de><op.uxusbswp1e62zd@merlin.emma.line.org><BEE762CA-4282-4BA8-B92B-AFC7AAE3CA9A@lassitu.de>	<ABCF4747-24D4-4435-952B-EA85A2AE999F@lassitu.de> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4304DB85EF@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Li, Qing wrote:
> I will look into it.
> 
> -- Qing
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
>> current@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Bethke
>> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 9:46 AM
>> To: Qing Li; Bjoern A. Zeeb
>> Cc: Matthias Andree; FreeBSD Current
>> Subject: Re: recent change to ifconfig breaks OpenVPN?
>>
>> Am 30.07.2009 um 08:40 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
>>
>>> Am 30.07.2009 um 01:46 schrieb Matthias Andree:
>>>
>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>
>>>> If that is the case, then we should go quickly to either make it go
>>>> into 8-CURRENT's ports or OpenVPN 2.1, or both.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure I have sufficient context or time to read up to
>>>> determine my own role here (I haven't been following -current for
>>>> lack of time); can someone summarize the issue for me?
>>> I can try to summarize; I don't think I'll have time to come up with
>>> a patch this weekend.
>>>
>>> The problem appears to be that OpenVPN invokes ifconfig with
>>> incorrect (but previously working) parameters, namely "ifconfig tun0
>>> local_ip local_ip" instead of "ifconfig tun0 local_ip remote_ip".
>>> The problem does not appear to be the SIOCAIFADDR but the RT_ADD
>>> that ifconfig does.  When I drafted a replacement OpenVPN --up
>>> script yesterday, I also noticed that the parameters passed to the
>>> script are wrong (netmask instead of remote ip), and environment
>>> variables are partially not set (ifconfig_remote is empty).
>>>
>>> This issue appears to affect tun-mode connections; tap-mode
>>> connections appear to continue to work.

It seems that it doesn't like if both ends of a p2p
have the same address.
This is a numbering scheme sometimes used in routers,
but it has funny side effects on hosts. For example both hosts would 
respond to ssh 'local_ip'. I'm in two minds as to whether one would 
want to allow this.

>>>
>>> I'm not sure if that is a more general problem with OpenVPN (at
>>> least in --topology subnet mode), or a specific problem in the
>>> FreeBSD-specific code.  I just looked at a Linux box connected to
>>> the same OpenVPN server, and their ifconfig invocation looks
>>> different from ours, so the FreeBSD-specific code at least plays
>>> some role.
>>>
>>> I'd still like to know whether the change to the routing code is
>>> intentional or a regression.
>> I did at least have time to figure out the commit that changed it:
>> 195914
>>
>>> Author: qingli
>>> Date: Mon Jul 27 17:08:06 2009
>>> New Revision: 195914
>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195914
>>>
>>> Log:
>>>  This patch does the following:
>>>
>>>      - Allow loopback route to be installed for address assigned to
>>>        interface of IFF_POINTOPOINT type.
>>>      - Install loopback route for an IPv4 interface addreess when
> the
>>>        "useloopback" sysctl variable is enabled. Similarly, install
>>>        loopback route for an IPv6 interface address when the sysctl
>>> variable
>>>        "nd6_useloopback" is enabled. Deleting loopback routes for
>>> interface
>>>        addresses is unconditional in case these sysctl variables
> were
>>>        disabled after an interface address has been assigned.
>>
>> Setting net.link.ether.inet.useloopback=0 does not restore the
>> previous behavior.
>>
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>> --
>> Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>   Fon +49 151 14070811
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-
>> unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A71D3AB.2070504>