Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 03:01:13 -0500 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@internetcds.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS issues Message-ID: <16087.915004873@gjp.erols.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Dec 1998 17:26:22 PST." <Pine.NEB.3.95.981229172606.634O-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jaye Mathisen wrote in message ID <Pine.NEB.3.95.981229172606.634O-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>: > > Nah, need to get some layer 4 switches running, and a FreeBSD cvsup farm > going... I think a distributed-director type setup would work much better. Having L4 switches implies that all your servers are in one facility. That implies the network problems such as wcarchive experiences with lack of peering (or simply the peering pipes are too small). Having distributed servers is *much* preferable, even from a redundancy standpoint if nothing else. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16087.915004873>