Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 13:08:34 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Consoles, past and future. Message-ID: <20050902100834.GB25237@straylight.m.ringlet.net> In-Reply-To: <34962.1125655258@phk.freebsd.dk> References: <20050902053927.3656b245@localhost> <34962.1125655258@phk.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:00:58PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050902053927.3656b245@localhost>, Tom Rhodes writes: >=20 >=20 > >My question is, and I know this hasn't been tested so be my > >guest and theorize a bit. Are there any performance gains > >or losses as a result of taking this route? >=20 > If we are concerned about the performance of /dev/console, we > need our collective heads and tails smacked until we come to > our senses :-) Somebody fortune this! :) (Hey, 'fortune' is a verb, innit now?) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@cnsys.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish. --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDGCSi7Ri2jRYZRVMRAmDaAJ93dTeY9bdbVnLJk15Ja8HG35mcHwCeLUIy VDc6X/UEjTAdiEGVN3P7uQA= =yK3D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050902100834.GB25237>