Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 15:44:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> To: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@muc.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/japanese/xemacs Makefile ports/japanese/xemacs/pkg DESCR ports/japanese/xemacs-canna Makefile ports/japanese/xemacs-canna/pkg DESCR ports/japanese/xemacs-canna+wnn4 Makefile ports/japanese/xemacs-canna+wnn4/pkg DESCR ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909091543430.373-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <199909092036.WAA74243@peedub.muc.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > This is getting out of hand. We have so many various xemacs ports now that > I'm losing track. There seems to be a lot of redundancy. The xemacs21 > maintainer asked to update to 21.1.6 but I'm starting to wonder whether > it's worth doing since most of the changes I'd make are already in one > or more of these other ports. Every time a Big Emacs Commit comes through, I say the same thing. Every time I'm met with "They really are different!". They all belong in one non-virtual category, if you ask me. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909091543430.373-100000>