Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:48:15 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Koop Mast <kwm@FreeBSD.org>, x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r342587 - head/x11/pixman Message-ID: <20140307134815.GB24846@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140307144458.6634ca47@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <201402041839.s14IdgAF097754@svn.freebsd.org> <20140204210959.044bc79a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140205121525.GB24764@FreeBSD.org> <20140304170740.GA82945@FreeBSD.org> <20140307144458.6634ca47@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 02:44:58PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 17:07:40 +0000 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 12:15:25PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> +1. I've always had to read inside the Makefile to understand what does > >> this option do; it's very confusing up-front. Please remove it and/or > >> hide the logic behind the trunk, so it DTRT without annoying users with > >> cryptic dialogs. > > > > Do we have any consensus on this one now? Can we just remove the whole > > SIMD logic from the Makefile? > > If nobody can come up with a reason to keep it, I'd say remove it. Affirmative. If no one will speak up before Monday, I'll remove entire OPTIONS block, unless someone beats me on this. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140307134815.GB24846>