Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:20:27 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r208459 - head/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/hardware Message-ID: <20100524152026.GF1396@arthur.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20100524122345.GI68288@alchemy.franken.de> References: <201005231946.o4NJkJLL072302@svn.freebsd.org> <20100524113941.GA1396@arthur.nitro.dk> <20100524122345.GI68288@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2010.05.24 14:23:45 +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 01:39:42PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > On 2010.05.23 19:46:19 +0000, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > New Revision: 208459 > > > > > > Log: > > > Update the sparc64 hardware list regarding machines that will be supported > > > beginning with 8.1-RELEASE as well as correct some existing entries and > > > add previously missed ones. > > > > > <listitem> > > > - <para>&netra; t1 105</para> > > > + <para>&sun; &netra; t1 100/105</para> > > > > If the product is called Netra and you just added the Sun part to > > identify the company it should just be Sun, and not &sun; as you are > > refering to Sun the company and not as part of a trademark. > > > > (It's a bit since I looked at it, but I'm rather sure above ist still > > the case.) > > > > > + <para>Starting with 8.1-RELEASE, &arch.sparc64; systems based on > > > + &fujitsu; &sparc64; V are also supported by &os;, which > > > + includes the following known working systems:</para> > > > > Same here, if you are refering to Fujitsu the company it should not > > include a trademark symbol. > > > > It's kind of hard to think of a case where one would use the name > of a company in a way that doesn't refer to the company but rather > to a trademark when even using "company product" doesn't mean to > refer to it as part of a trademark :) I.e. when would one have to > use the company trademark? Indeed :). I tried a quick check to see where I found the specific examples (which I do remember existing at least at one point) but I couldn't find them now. > In any case, do the attached patches look correct to you? Yes, that looks good - please commit that. (IE, "Approved" with my doc hat.) -- Simon L. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100524152026.GF1396>