Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:16:06 +0100
From:      Koen Smits <kgysmits@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Cc:        Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing.
Message-ID:  <b072dc420901210116s43a96f75r461991918a4a6415@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4976C370.4030406@dannysplace.net>
References:  <20081031033208.GA21220@icarus.home.lan> <F55CD13C-8117-4D34-9C35-618D28F9F2DE@spry.com> <20081117070818.GA22231@icarus.home.lan> <496549D9.7010003@dannysplace.net> <b072dc420901072348n7d094937u89b6d24959f8ae3d@mail.gmail.com> <4966B6B1.8020502@dannysplace.net> <b072dc420901090046v77bc5407xacda5e65fc6ad7bf@mail.gmail.com> <496712A2.4020800@dannysplace.net> <b072dc420901090758o4190be22sa747862d9aa77abf@mail.gmail.com> <4976C370.4030406@dannysplace.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> Areca Support:
> Dear Sir,
> the only difference is
> in JBOD mode, controller configure all drives as passthrough disk.
> in RAID mode, you have to configure passthrough disk by yourself in RAID
> mode
>
> in other words, you can use raid with passthrough disks at saem time in
> RAID mode but JBOD mode not.
>
> Me:
> So does that mean if I use passthrough, I am not protected by the
> cache/battery backup?  I ask because there is an option for cache mode
> when creating a passthrough disk.  i.e. Write-Back or Write-Through


missed my 'reply to all' button, here goes the 2nd try.

So 'passthrough' means that the controller lets the OS see the physical
disks just as they are, but with an invisible cache in between that buffers
operations. This way there is no advantage of the onboard XOR engine, but
you do profit from the intelligent cache, which is the most important anyway
imho.
JBOD mode is at a disadvantage because in this mode the OS sees one large
drive, and is not able to stripe the data to multiple disks, not taking
advantage of the fact that you have multple spindles available.
Makes sense to me :).
I must admit, I do like these results. Very promising.

Further tests would be using an SSD for the ZIL, testing linux and NT, etc.
But let's not go there ;).



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b072dc420901210116s43a96f75r461991918a4a6415>