Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 03:31:51 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Guyomarch?= <rguyom@pobox.com> To: Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org>, FreeBSD Security List <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Bump-in-the-Road IPsec? Message-ID: <20011113033151.A56326@diabolo.ifn.fr> In-Reply-To: <20011113031438.A45472@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net>; from rguyom@pobox.com on Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:14:38AM %2B0100 References: <20011112164936.F538-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> <20011113031438.A45472@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 03:14:38AM +0100, Rémi Guyomarch wrote: ... > On OpenBSD, use the gif device, along with IPSec in transport mode > and the same bridge setup as described below. Damn! I just realised that gif(4) only handles IP frames :-( Still a transparent bridge, but only suitable for IP... [same thing with gre(4)] So far, for full ethernet-over-ip the only solution I see is vtun with a tap(4) device. Maybe someone there will feel creative with netgraph ? ;) -- Rémi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011113033151.A56326>