Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
From:      John Kozubik <john@kozubik.com>
To:        kris@ixsystems.com
Cc:        "'Alexander Leidinger'" <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: How many "production" releases will FreeBSD have when the ZoL merge comes in ?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1907100800111.84301@kozubik.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e0401d5372f$ccbc9800$6635c800$@ixsystems.com>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1907091556410.84301@kozubik.com> <16bdb16ada8.27fa.fa4b1493b064008fe79f0f905b8e5741@Leidinger.net> <2e0401d5372f$ccbc9800$6635c800$@ixsystems.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Kris,

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, kris@ixsystems.com wrote:

> I'm keeping the port pretty updated for exactly this reason. We intend to
> use it for FreeBSD 12 here at iX, so far it seems to work pretty well.
> You'll just need to build world without ZFS so you don't end up with
> conflicts on zfs/zpool and libzfs.


Are you currently using ZoL in production for customers ?

Pardon my ignorance, but is ZoL in use anywhere in FreeNAS/TrueNAS ?

I am pretty sure that we *cannot* run stock/standard ZFS in the base world 
and give someone in a jail ZoL (with a module) correct ?

Thanks.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1907100800111.84301>