Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 13:14:36 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Importing the fusefs kernel module? Message-ID: <AANLkTi=b6M1KRQXwy7ucXx2yz2bdkiGKkNiCgOXwx5Be@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikR2YuLA-SGc2HKNp94BEBFF0%2BhO2ye-=qJVnwD@mail.gmail.com> References: <ia4qnl$bgl$1@dough.gmane.org> <20101025211904.GM2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20101026205801.GA39716@zim.MIT.EDU> <D1BAEBBF-4CD4-4C2A-A877-B86D6322E6C7@samsco.org> <AANLkTikR2YuLA-SGc2HKNp94BEBFF0%2BhO2ye-=qJVnwD@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 October 2010 02:22, Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> wrote: > =C2=A0 =C2=A0If this module was in the tree, could we drop other less > maintained filesystems, like our in-tree ntfs support (/sys/fs/ntfs/)? I'd vote for "yes". > =C2=A0 =C2=A0So I would be game to help maintain things, but I'd need hel= p > getting up to speed on FUSE and figure out the lay of the land. I > wouldn't be very effective for a while though because I'm not > knowledgeable in the ways of the vfs[, yet?].. It's about the same story with me - given that I'm always playing with storage, I'll get to VFS eventually. Could 2 half-maintainers instead of one full maintainer be enough to satisfy the doubters? :) How about 3? (I know someone who's also interested in a junior-hacker kind of way)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=b6M1KRQXwy7ucXx2yz2bdkiGKkNiCgOXwx5Be>