Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:13:31 +0300 From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com> To: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why panic(9) ? Message-ID: <86ipxfqkmc.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D3CB2FE.2080603@gmail.com> (David Demelier's message of "Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:14 %2B0100") References: <AANLkTi=OQbS-0jJx0YwZhM7xDWPLOkaYYZAYfESUEvvM@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=6ODRNH5Z_oRVzqWStAuv%2B4-aBDoUSY5baYkvQ@mail.gmail.com> <4D3CB2FE.2080603@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com> writes: > In any case, when panic occurs, switching display to the tty can be > great. Why not a sysctl like kern.tty_on_panic? Because when you're > running X and a panic occurs not everybody understand what happens. IIRC, it requires KMS support.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ipxfqkmc.fsf>