Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 15:00:44 -0700 From: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@HeadCandy.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unix/NT synchronization model (was: SMP progress?) Message-ID: <199606042200.PAA23901@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 04 Jun 96 14:06:26 -0700. <1368.833922386@critter.tfs.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
>> Another question I have: What is the "reference" model for SMP
>> synchronization methods in Unix? Solaris? OSF/1? For those who are
>> familiar with the Windows NT synchronization model, how does this Unix
>> reference model compare? I. e. what are the similarties and
>> differences?
>To Be Decided really...
Maybe "reference model" was too strong. Where do most of you get your
ideas for what SMP synchronization should look like in FreeBSD? From
Solaris? OSF/1? Somewhere else?
Since my only threaded/multi-CPU-aware code has all been written in
Windows NT, I'd like to find out what a "good" Unix synchronization
implementation looks like.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@HeadCandy.com
--< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >--
NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3,
Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32...
NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others...
Roll your own Internet access -- Seattle People's Internet cooperative.
If you're in the Seattle area, ask me how.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606042200.PAA23901>