Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 12:22:43 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make arch.c compat.c cond.c dir.c hash.c job.c job.h list.h lst.h main.c make.c make.h parse.c sprite.h suff.c targ.c var.c src/usr.bin/make/lst.lib lstAppend.c lstConcat.c lstDatum.c lstDeQueue.c lstDestroy.c lstDupl.c ... Message-ID: <200012031022.eB3AMje33008@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012031903500.591-100000@besplex.bde.org> ; from Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> "Sun, 03 Dec 2000 19:12:24 %2B1100." References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012031903500.591-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > There's no reason to use fancy forms of NULL. Replace all instances > > of NIL, NILLST, NILLGNODE, etc. with NULL. > > K&R support is one reason. There are also stylistic reasons. Programmers > who believe in explicit casting of values returned by malloc(), like the > author of make(1), may believe in explicit types for everything. K&R is not a reason anymore. There are ANSI --> K&R tools. Supporting K&R today makes as much sense as supporting BCPL. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012031022.eB3AMje33008>