Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:06:33 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 186841] rc.conf ifconfig syntax for binding ip-ranges broken [regression]
Message-ID:  <bug-186841-4805-ncsM3wPAoZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-186841-4805@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-186841-4805@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186841

--- Comment #6 from Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Hiroki Sato from comment #4)
> Sorry, I had missed this PR.  I am thinking that making _IPEXPANDMAX be
> user-configurable in rc.conf is better than removing it completely because
> the number of resulting addresses can be too large.  Do you have any
> specific reason that we should remove this restriction at all?

My reasoning is that it is a regression over how the _addrs mechanism has
always worked. It would make sense to limit the ranges by the size of the CIDR
mask, but a blanket limit is not right IMHO. If the user specifies X-N/MASK
they expect all IPS between X and N to be added, at least for the size of the
mask.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-186841-4805-ncsM3wPAoZ>