Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:16:19 -0300 From: Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_TELNET=yes .. does it work? Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0911180716x3985e862r52ac376bebe6fb11@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86lji3ucbm.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <200911172027.15749.gnemmi@gmail.com> <a0777e080911180222i66b5effcg2ef329e9f9a3cf28@mail.gmail.com> <19e9a5dc0911180634h2484d4d7seedc1611c7e218f2@mail.gmail.com> <86lji3ucbm.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/11/18 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> > Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com> writes: > > Would you advice me not to use that line, and could you tell me why? > > (really honest question ... I mean maybe WITHOUT_FLOOPY=3Dyes interfere= s > > with something else that I'm not aware of) > > I can guarantee you that WITHOUT_FLOOPY will not interfere, nor indeed > interact, with anything whatsoever :P > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no > You mean the spelling DES. Thanks for pointing that out. Best Regards Gonzalo Nemmi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19e9a5dc0911180716x3985e862r52ac376bebe6fb11>