Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 20:05:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Vermillion <bill@bilver.magicnet.net> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Routing problem Message-ID: <199809250005.UAA11898@bilver.magicnet.net> In-Reply-To: <199809241509.KAA11221@carp.gbr.epa.gov> from Mike Jenkins at "Sep 24, 98 10:09:09 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Jenkins recently said: > On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 Bill Vermillion wrote: > > > Or have I TOTALLY screwed up my understanding of how this works? > Maybe a picture will help. I believe he is using 255.255.0.0 for > the netmasks. > > 10.1.0.0/16 10.2.0.0/16 > Internet-----[NAT router]-------------------[freebsd]------------------ > 10.1.0.155 10.1.0.253 10.2.0.253 > If the router is using 255.255.0.0 for the netmask then it only knows > about network 10.1.0.0 and will have to be told about network 10.2.0.0 > by adding a route for 10.2.0.0 with 10.1.0.253 as the gateway. > If the router is using 255.0.0.0 for the netmask then it thinks all of > network 10.0.0.0 is on the ethernet but can't reach 10.2.0.0 hosts. > Using the arpproxy_all="YES" option in /etc/rc.conf should fix it. Thanks. I's logical. I think I understand that. But what wrote was truly screwy. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809250005.UAA11898>