Date: 05 Mar 2001 15:20:18 +0100 From: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: Mark Murray <markm@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/kerberos5/usr.bin Makefile src/kerberos5/usr.bin/k5su Makefile Message-ID: <5lk864thzx.fsf@assaris.sics.se> In-Reply-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine"'s message of "Mon, 5 Mar 2001 06:51:58 -0600" References: <200103051118.f25BIZW85891@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010305065158.C78960@spawn.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> writes: > Will we always have this dichotomy between kblah/k5blah utilities? It is > fairly annoying. Anecdotally, there don't seem to be many new Kerberos > IV installations, & Kerberos V's utilities can get/list/trash version 4 > & 5 tickets. Yes. My current plan of things to happen (in -current and after 4.3) is to ditch the v4 programs basically and install the v5 ones under the canonical names (with v4-compatibility if compiled in). And to always build and install the krb5 programs/libraries, but ifdef'ing the support in other programs. How does that sounds? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5lk864thzx.fsf>